...why not?

            Architecture is an artistic language; it is about communication.  Communication is the process of exchanging information, usually via a common system of symbols, this process allows for interaction.   As architects, we communicate through process, form (defined by structure and manifested by material), and materiality.  Driven by unparallel forces, this artistic language is an evolutionary process, subject to change by technology and cultural preferences.  The modern architectural language must be constantly revaluated and reconfigured to adapt to changing technologies and a changing society.  

The building process and its inherent means of expression rely on the intelligent and sensitive use of materials, which in terms of their availability, suitability, cost, and technology necessary to produce them vary according to time and place.  Architects continuously adjust their “style of expression” (architectural language) in response to the newest building materials and technologies of its era.  The Greeks used stone columns and beams to structure their temples; Roman basilicas contained brick walls, arches, vaults, and domes; Gothic Cathedrals were structured with limestone ribs and panel vaults; The Industrial Revolution produced train stations and market halls cast of wrought iron; The Chicago School’s high-rises became rolled-steel frames; The Modern Movement gave birth to reinforced concrete; Russian constructivists, British High-Tech’s, and U.S. deconstructionists adapted rolled-steel, braced frameworks; The focus of architectural communication since the late seventies, has been on a dematerialization, or transparency of the wall, which is apparent in a modern language defined by skins and surfaces.            

The practice of modern architecture thrives on innovation, innovation breed’s new means of communication; as architects we should concern ourselves with material studies and technological advancement and their effect on architectural language through form and performance.  My intention for thesis is to investigate today’s revolutionary new materials and methods of fabrication, as to better understand the profound impact they have on architects’ conception of form and modes of production, which contribute to the continuing evolution of modern architectural language.  I would like to create a source where this information could be shared by architects and students, and manifest a project that communicates a modern architectural language. 

I think an interesting idea would be to exploit the role of the computer in architectural conversation, and experiment with the computer as a forum for design communication, where a number of students/faculty could work simultaneously on a object/form in three dimensional model space.  The result being a single form representing an architectural conversation, in which physical models could be derived (via the use of the laser cutter/ CNC router).  This would be an interesting process resulting in a “communal design” to be shared/argued/defended by all.