A Really Long Title
by A Ton of People

Synopsis:

The first part of this report, Studio Culture Critiqued, explores the current state of studio education, examines outside forces impacting architecture education, and calls for change in studio culture. Describing Studio Culture analyzes the historical roots of studio culture, states a series of myths prevalent within studio education, and discusses other elements that characterize this culture. In the section titled Current Aspects of Studio Culture, we provide a more in-depth commentary on twelve topics that we feel most be questioned in order to design a more successful studio culture. New Visions, Shared Values proposes five values, Optimism, Respect, Sharing, Engagement, and Innovation which we believe could serve as the foundation for necessary change. In the portion titled, A Call to Action, we have suggested roles that students, educators, administrators, and organizations can play in shaping a new future for architecture education. A New Program for the Design of Studio Culture lists a number of goals that can be embraced in creating change. Finally, the Afterward section includes a description of the process of the Studio Culture Task Force’s efforts.

Response:

Man, I really hate that I fucking agree with these articles! I love tearing these doodly-bops up... but, I haven't gotten the chance, yet. Anyway, this article was pretty damn "on target." I found myself all weekend talking about it to anyone who would listen. Why? Oh... I have reasons, people! The main thing I agreed with would have to be the section on "Design Process is as Important as Product." The quality of ideas and process behind the design project seems more important to me than the final appearance. I understand that a model or drawing should be sucessful in visually communicating an idea... but, if the idea is shit... does it matter if the final product is orgasmic!? The section on "Grades Impeding Productive Assessment" was kind of curious, though... I really do not think that grades create negative competition... if anything, it is a healthy way of challenging one another... or as John Middleton would put it, "raising the bar" for one another. Grades only produce a negative effect within a group of immature or assholeish folks. Enough about the details... the article overall made me excited... think of the possiblities, people! Sharing... collaboration... innovation... optimism!



































--
>>>Peer Responses